context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. Review content serves two purposes. We trace how the notion of fairness has been defined within the A key goal of the fair-ML community is to develop machine-learning based systems that, once introduced into a social context, can achieve social and legal outcomes such as fairness, justice, and due process. will take place in the context of a worldwide reckoning with racism and placed at risk, avoiding deceptive practices when not essential, GitHub - lixin4ever/Conference-Acceptance-Rate: Acceptance rates for FAccT* also welcomes full paper submissions that extend previously published short papers or abstracts, even if they appeared in formal proceedings, if the previously published version does not exceed 4 pages in length. We will expand on this below. If authors have failed to anonymize their submission please inform the program co-chairs by emailing program-chairs@facctconference.org. pages (including all figures and tables), plus unlimited pages for It can be tempting to only comment on the weaknesses; however, Track Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. It is not fair to dismiss any submission without having thoroughly read it. Those who do not pre-register Always be constructive and help the authors understand your viewpoint, without being dismissive or using inappropriate language. ACM CONFERENCE SHOWCASES RESEARCH ON FAIRNESS, - GlobeNewswire News Room If using LaTeX, please use the template given in sample-manuscript.tex when downloading the latest version of the ACM LaTeX documents. Note that submitting research for approval by each authors institutional ethics review body (IRB) may be necessary in some cases, but by itself may not be sufficient. The fourth annual ACM FAccT conference will take place online March 3-10, 2021. What kinds of marginalization are relevant to How can perspectives and tools from FACCT Conference - Home - ACM Digital Library In cases where the Program Chairs (PC) have concerns about Strong work makes a contribution that his important to the FAccT academic field. TBA) or none at all at the abstract submission deadline may be They should be respected and taken into account, but their comments should not be confused with the peer review. Although it is only in its fifth year, FAccT has rapidly become the premiere venue for leading-edge research in the fairness, accountability, and transparency of socio-technical systems. For fields that typically publish in journals, submissions should be of the quality that would warrant a journal submission, though may be shorter due to different page constraints. We are concerned with complex data in which variables may take any value from a contiguous range or an additional set of discrete states. 2.556; the score needed to be in the top 25.7% (acceptance rate for CHI2019). Recently, deep anomaly detection methods were shown to achieve superior results particularly in complex data such as images. Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. The work situates itself in the context of related work. Consider a cost-sharing game with players of different costs: an example might be an insurance company calculating premiums for a population of mixed-risk individuals. option for the FAccT submission. Thus, we seek an area and discipline-specific quality assessment for each submission. not be told whether submissions under review are archival or not, to Reviewers will be invited to The program and area It will help the Area Chairs and Program Chairs decide whether to accept the submissions. These works may be submitted as-is or in an extended form. At least one author of each accepted paper is required to register for, (virtually) attend, and present the work at the conference in order for the paper to appear in the conference proceedings in the ACM Digital Library. You should explain these values in the "Detailed Comments " text field. versions that are currently under review at another conference, have If you use an AI tool to automatically create captions from audio, please make sure to proofread and edit accordingly, to ensure that the captions accurately convey your presentation. ACM FAccT (formerly known as ACM FAT*) solicits work For authors, it provides transparency into our decisions and, as such, guidance for revising their work for rebuttal and for their final presentation. This also provides transparency and guidance to authors interested in improving their work for the ACM FAT* audience. And stay tuned for updates by following @facctconference on Twitter or joining the FACCT-ANNOUNCE listserv. fairness, accountability and transparency (broadly construed). websites or apps), or (2) rely on sensitive user data (e.g., social Pre-registration only requires that you "save a draft" of your submission. ACM ethics guidelines. for other questions/comments, hello@facctconference.org. If you have a question about the reviewing system, your primary point of contact should be the PC Chairs. A variety of programs are available to embed captions into your videos. Many parts of this guide have been inspired by or outright lifted from the excellent NIPS Reviewer, AC & SAC Guidelines. Contrastive Learning with Complex Heterogeneity. Authors are required to pre-register their papers through the submission Using an Ethics of Care to Promote Diverse Voices, Differential Tweetment: Mitigating Racial Dialect Bias in Harmful Tweet Detection, Can You Fake It Until You Make It? And stay tuned for updates by following @facctconference. Conference: 12-15 June 2022 Chicago, IL. Authors can use their preferred tools to record videos. Please provide an Overall Score for each submission. Your review is important for two reasons: Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible -- short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review, since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. The previous two conferences had acceptance rates of 25% and attracted attendees from across academia, industry and public policy. option after submission is discouraged but justified requests from ACM FAccT 2021 offers authors the Questions? FAccT is committed to strengthening the disciplinary and interdisciplinary areas it touches by maintaining a high standard of quality in the submissions it accepts. Lilly Irani, University of California, San Diego, Sampath Kannan, University of Pennsylvania. Copyright 2023 ACM, Inc. Area chairs will oversee the reviewing process. 9%! Contact the Program Co-chairs: program-chairs@facctconference.org. storage of sensitive data, voluntary and informed consent if users are https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj T. Kamishima, P.-N. Schwab, and M. D. Ekstrand. present their work at the FAccT 2021 conference, regardless of whether form. (Acceptance rate: 16%) 11. Beginning next year, submissions for FAccT 2022 In this light, we especially welcome attention to to ensure that authors receive high quality feedback on their submissions. Conference-length versions of papers that are already under review at a journal, but which have not yet been published in that journal: In such cases, authors must select the non-archival option for the FAccT submission. The research community is young but growing fast. publication archive. In-person presentations must be live. Reviewers will not be told whether submissions under review are archival or not, to avoid influencing their evaluations. It builds on the success of the 2020 conference held in Barelona, and is the first conference under the new name! Please set the anonymous option for review. and abstracts up until the full paper submission deadline, however the ACM FAccT - 2020 CFP - Reviewing Guidelines study and development of computing as a field of knowledge and It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses, however, Area Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. preliminary title and abstract should be representative of the submitted ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. SIGN IN Get Alerts for this Conference Save to Binder Export Citation Next Conference FAccT '23 Sponsor: with the review process, authors are asked to select one or more of the Furthermore, reviewers will With these considerations in mind, the Organizing Committee has decided on the following format: For each paper, authors must upload *two* pre-recorded video presentations. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) for socio-tech- nicalsystemshasbeenathrivingareaofresearchinrecentyears.An ACM conference bearing the same name has been the central venue for scholars in this area to come together, provide peer feedback to one another, and publish their work. Please note that in contrast to usability and accessibility as well as support the longevity of ACM 2018. We will use concerning the areas of interest and possibly sub-disciplines) at the dedicated website. Instead, meanings range from typical or characteristic, to a proportionate match between sample and population, to a more Government agencies are embracing machine learning to support a variety of resource allocation decisions. DO NOT talk to anyone about specific submissions, reviews, or discussions of papers that you reviewed after decisions have been announced. We will be aided in this To that end, if you need to cite existing work, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. This year we have a dedicated LAW track and a dedicated SSH (social sciences & humanities) track, next to the CS (computer science) track (plus two more tracks, dedicated to cross-disciplinary education, and to practice and experience). Email Forgot your password? Ask yourself, Do the other reviewers' comments make sense?" This dichotomy undermines efforts to make algorithmic systems more fair, transparent, and accountable. The conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. These tests are often run on their websites without explicit consent from users. ACM FAccT 2022 [Distinguished Paper Award] (acceptance rate: 25%) D. Fu, L. Fang, R. Maciejewski, V. Tovik, and J. Options and templates are available for both Word and LaTeX users. If so, one cross-disciplinary reviewer will be asked to review in a 14 working day time-frame as set out above. He was elected an ACM Fellow in 2019. Papers got accepted to ACM CCS, IEEE ICC, IEEE CNS, IEEE Milcom, and. Using inappropriate or derogatory language is not acceptable. Submissions that have placeholder titles and abstracts (e.g., Please provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. The conference organizers welcome your contributions and insights. This process will enable the Program Chairs to better anticipate the submission load and to make necessary adjustments to the program committee. The Fourth Workshop on Responsible Recommendation (FAccTRec 2021) was held in conjunction with the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems on September, 2021 at Amsterdam, Netherlands, in a hybrid format. Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. In such applications, individuals should have the ability to change the decision of the model. Regardless of norms in the home discipline and the choice to submit as archival or non-archival, papers submitted to FAccT are expected to be of publication-ready quality. There is one key exception. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. Submitted papers must be 8-10 For LAW and SSH this would regard acceptance in top tier international peer reviewed journals. The objectives of the reviewing process are: The first objective ensures that ACM FAT* is considered a top tier venue for the discussion of fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be rejected without review. He. : Investigating Online A/B/n Tests in-the-Wild, The Social Cost of Strategic Classification, Access to Population-Level Signaling as a Source of Inequality, The Disparate Effects of Strategic Manipulation, All Holdings within the ACM Digital Library. The PC will take a broad view of what constitutes an ethical concern, and authors agree to be available at any time during the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding ethical considerations. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of At least one author of each accepted paper is required to In Proceed- on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT ings of the Fourteenth Workshop on Semantic Evalua- '21, page 610-623, New York, NY, USA. Thanks for contributing to FAccT 22! The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. ACM FAccT uses a mutually anonymous review process. For example, if College A has 100,000 applicants and accepts 5,000 students, their acceptance rate is 5%. prepare the eventual rebuttal and revise their work for final presentation. The research program of ACM FAccT solicits academic work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer . Note that submitting FAccTRec 2021: The 4th Workshop on Responsible - ACM Conferences The ACM CHI Conference, 'CHI2021', Online Virtual Conference. Authors of all accepted papers must These workflow and formatting changes will improve Abstract submission: 30 January 2023 11:59pm Anywhere on Earth. Trusted AI literature to date has focused on the trust needs of users who knowingly interact with discrete AIs. For media inquiries, please contact press@facctconference.org; The latest data we have shows there are 11,240 reviews in the system. This algorithm uses both your topic preference as well as the order of your preferences to determine assignments. proceedings, if they are accepted. faced in their work. insufficiently addressed issues in computing such as: How do algorithmic To reconcile algorithmic Price discrimination - offering different prices to different customers - has become common practice. Werbach K Panopticon Reborn: Social Credit as Regulation for the Age of AI. Authors will be asked to select one or more of the above areas when they register their submissions. ACM - for attending CODS-COMAD 2022 Conference registration scholarships ICLR 2021, ICML 2021, NAACL 2021, ICWSM 2021, CVPR 2021, WiNLP EMNLP 2022 Languages English Native or bilingual. In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding. the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding FAccT22 is the first FAccT to run with both online and in-person components. FAccT 2021 Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency You may Although machine learning models can sometimes achieve impressive Formulating data science problems is an uncertain and difficult process. Text should be dark, with lots of space around the letters, and in a legible and suitably large font. towards more ethical computing scholarship in future years. beneficence (maximizing the benefits to an individual or to society It is in your best interest to provide your preferences during the bidding phase. It is okay to be unavailable for part of the review process (e.g., on vacation for a few days), but if you will be unavailable for more than that -- especially during important windows (e.g., discussion, decision-making) -- you must let the Track Chairs know. This paper argues for more caution with the use of counterfactuals when the facts to be Subset selection algorithms are ubiquitous in AI-driven applications, including, online recruiting portals and image search engines, so it is imperative that these tools are not discriminatory on the basis of protected attributes such as gender or race. transparency in computational systems, including critical approaches If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. Paper authors who travel to Seoul will present in an in-person proceedings session in the Seoul program. Though familiar at first blush, it lacks a single precise meaning. reconsider their reviews and scores in light of rebuttals before final FACCT-ANNOUNCE Archives ACM FAcct Announcements: FACCT-ANNOUNCE@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG: LISTSERV Archives: FACCT-ANNOUNCE Home: Log In: Register: Subscribe or Unsubscribe: Search Archives: Options: Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers: Message: (IRB) may be necessary in some cases, but by itself may not be . KDD 2022 (acceptance rate: 14.99%) L. Zheng, J. Xiong, Y. Zhu, and J. The in-person conference will take place in the COEX exhibition centre in Seoul, South Korea on June 21-24 2022 Korea Standard Time (KST). KDD 2022 (acceptance rate: 14.99%) In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding . ACM FAccT solicits work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and policy, and multidisciplinary scholarships on fairness, accountability and transparency in computational systems (broadly construed). The PC chairs consider this to be an integral part of the reviewing process and a foundational step in creating and constructing impactful interdisciplinary work. For Track Chairs and Program Chairs, it provides a basis for decision-making about a submission. You will be asked to provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be rejected without review. HotCRP.com signin Sign in using your HotCRP.com account. Reviews are due by March 21 11:59 pm AoE. In the case of CS or quantitative SH/Law, the work provides unique data, unique conclusions about existing data, and/or a unique theoretical or experimental approach. The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale: Note: If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Area Chair as early as possible in the process. The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. ACM FAccT uses a mutually June 12-15, 2023 in Chicago, USA. Optionally, authors can upload supplementary materials (e.g., appendices) with their submission, but reviewers will not be required to read the supplementary materials, so authors are encouraged to use them judiciously. FAccT22 has the same acceptance rate of previous editions but the most accepted papers so far - we received almost double the submissions of 2021, and have accepted double the number of papers (181 in total). authors will be examined by PC Chairs on a case-by-case basis. ACM FAccT is an interdisciplinary conference publishing research in algorithmic fairness, accountability, and transparency. Authors unsure about topical fit or ethical issues are welcome to contact the PC. Coordinating with other reviewers and track chairs by, completing peer reviews/cross-reviews in a timely manner, and. If English style or grammar are issues, please write your review politely, and avoid language that could be perceived as discriminatory. questions. If you accidentally find out, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chairs that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. Authors unsure about topical fit or ethical You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. We will create a form for you to share the links, which will be emailed to authors one week in advance of the deadline.The form for uploading your video is here. Further information on the expected format and research for approval by each authors institutional ethics review body deadlines are at 11:59 PM anywhere on earth (AoE) on the given date. It will help authors by providing both clarity about the reasons for our decision and useful feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their scholarship, which they can use to strengthen their work. All Recent research has successfully employed social media data to predict mental health states of individuals, A single algorithm drives an important health care decision for over 70 million people in the US. USA, Front matter (Title, Copyright, Welcome from the General Chairs, Welcome from the Program Chairs, Contents), FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Black Feminist Musings on Algorithmic Oppression, Price Discrimination with Fairness Constraints, Fairness Violations and Mitigation under Covariate Shift, Reasons, Values, Stakeholders: A Philosophical Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence, Allocating Opportunities in a Dynamic Model of Intergenerational Mobility, Corporate Social Responsibility via Multi-Armed Bandits, Biases in Generative Art: A Causal Look from the Lens of Art History, Designing an Online Infrastructure for Collecting AI Data From People With Disabilities, Fifty Shades of Grey: In Praise of a Nuanced Approach Towards Trustworthy Design, Representativeness in Statistics, Politics, and Machine Learning, The Distributive Effects of Risk Prediction in Environmental Compliance: Algorithmic Design, Environmental Justice, and Public Policy, Computer Science Communities: Who is Speaking, and Who is Listening to the Women?